
Casio PX-S1100
- Amazon USCurrent offers
- Key actionSmart Scaled Hammer Action
- Sound engineMulti-dimensional Morphing AiR
- Polyphony192 notes
Portability/connectivity pick
Check price on Amazon for the Casio PX-S1100 (opens in a new tab)

Head-to-head
Research-based review: we haven't played these pianos. Specs come from Casio's and Yamaha's official pages.
Quick verdict
Our pick: Casio PX-S1100
The Casio PX-S1100 is a good buy if you want a slim, light 88-key piano that runs on batteries, with Casio's Smart Scaled Hammer Action, 192-note polyphony and Bluetooth audio and MIDI through the included WU-BT10 adapter. Skip it if you want Yamaha's heavier GHS or GHC action, or a piano that never moves.
The Yamaha P-125 no longer has Amazon US offers. If you want a Yamaha, compare the newer P-145BT and P-225 instead.
Round by round
This Casio Privia PX-S1100 review looks at Casio's slim portable on its own terms and against the Yamaha it's often compared with, the P-125. Both have 88 weighted hammer-action keys and 192-note polyphony. The PX-S1100 is still a current Casio model with Amazon US offers; the original P-125 no longer has Amazon US offers, and Yamaha USA now lists the P-125a and the newer P-225 in its place, so we cover the newer Yamahas too. For broader brand context, our Yamaha vs Casio brand comparison covers the full lineups.
How we researched this
We haven't played the PX-S1100 or the P-125. This review draws on Casio's and Yamaha's official specification pages, owner reports and published reviews. Every spec in the tables comes from the maker's own page, linked under the verdict.
Before the details, here are the Casio PX-S1100's specs next to the Yamaha P-125's, including every spec that differs (or revealingly doesn't). This comparison drives every verdict in the rest of this review:
![]() | Spec | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | Amazon US offers | None |
| Smart Scaled Hammer Action | Key action | GHS (Graded Hammer Standard) |
| Multi-dimensional Morphing AiR | Sound engine | Pure CF Sound Engine |
| 192 notes | Polyphony | 192 notes |
| 18 | Voices | 24 |
| 16W (8W + 8W) | Speakers | 14W (7W × 2) |
| Audio + MIDI via included WU-BT10 adapter | Bluetooth | None listed |
| Casio Music Space (Bluetooth) | App support | Smart Pianist (USB) |
| 2 (stereo mini, 1/8") | Headphone jacks | 2 (standard, 1/4") |
| MIDI 1 song, 2 tracks; WAV audio to a USB drive | Onboard recorder | MIDI 1 song, 2 tracks |
| 6 × AA, about 4 hours | Battery option | None (AC only) |
| 24.7 lb (11.2 kg) | Weight | 26.0 lb (11.8 kg) |
| 52.0" × 9.1" × 4.0" | Width × Depth × Height | 52.2" × 11.6" × 6.5" |
Specs from Casio's and Yamaha's official pages. The PX-S1100 had Amazon US offers when we checked; the original P-125 had none.
Tip
Polyphony is identical at 192 notes, so the decision comes down to action feel, design, wireless workflow, recording, and the quality of any available listing. The PX-S1100 is the stronger portability and connectivity pick on features; the P-125 is now mainly a used-market piano.
The keys are the first thing to judge on the PX-S1100. Owners and reviewers agree that Casio's action feels different from Yamaha's under the fingers — not better or worse universally, but distinct enough that it's worth trying both in a store if you can.
The Casio PX-S1100 uses Casio's Smart Scaled Hammer Action Keyboard, which Casio says reproduces individual hammer behavior for each of its 88 textured keys, with five touch-sensitivity levels. In owner reports and published reviews it's usually described as lighter and quicker than Yamaha's entry-level actions, which suits pop, jazz and players coming from synths; some classical-track players find it too light for building control in slow passages.
The Yamaha P-125 uses Graded Hammer Standard (GHS), Yamaha's entry-level graded action, also used on the P-45. GHS is usually described as heavier and more traditional than Smart Scaled, closer to an acoustic upright, with a more deliberate keystroke. Many classical-track teachers like that weight for building finger control; the trade-off is that some players find it less responsive for fast lines.
Winner
Tie — depends on playing style. Smart Scaled wins for pop/jazz/synth-leaning players; GHS wins for classical-track learners who want acoustic-resemblance technique. Neither is objectively superior; both are legitimate entry-tier hammer actions.
Key-feel decision
Compare the action before choosing. This is the physical difference that matters most once you sit down to play.


The PX-S1100 builds its piano sound from acoustic grand samples processed through Casio's own engine, as the P-125 does with Yamaha's. Polyphony is identical at 192 notes — meaning neither board will drop notes during pedal-heavy practice — so this category comes down to sample quality and voice variety.
The PX-S1100 runs Casio's Multi-dimensional Morphing AiR Sound Source, derived from the company's higher Privia models. Reviewers generally describe AiR as bright and articulate, with a forward upper register that suits modern pop and jazz playing and layering with backing tracks. The trade-off: some classical-track players describe it as "too clean" or lacking the warmth they want for romantic-era repertoire.
The P-125 runs Yamaha's Pure CF Sound Engine, derived from the CFIIIS concert grand. Pure CF is usually described as warmer, with a fuller bass and longer sustain — the classic acoustic-grand character many teachers prefer for serious practice. The P-125 also has more voices: 24 vs the PX-S1100's 18, with wider electric piano and organ variety. For classical or jazz comping, Pure CF is the more traditionally piano-like sound.
Winner
P-125, narrowly. Pure CF is better-suited to traditional practice and offers six more voices. The PX-S1100's AiR engine is genuinely competitive for modern styles.
Casio lists 16W (2 × 8W) for the PX-S1100, against the P-125's 14W (2 × 7W). In practice, the 2-watt difference is barely 1 dB — well below the threshold most listeners can perceive, and not enough to call a category winner on raw output alone.
Yamaha lists two 12 cm speakers plus two 4 cm speakers for the P-125; Casio lists two 16 x 8 cm oval speakers for the PX-S1100. Through headphones, speaker design doesn't matter at all, and both pianos have two headphone jacks: standard 1/4-inch on the P-125 and stereo mini (1/8-inch) on the PX-S1100, so either works for a teacher and student or a parent and child.
Winner
Tie. The PX-S1100 has slightly more power, the P-125 adds two small speakers, and both have two headphone jacks. For most home-practice volumes, both pianos are adequate — this is a tiebreaker category, not a deal-breaker.


This is the category where the PX-S1100 wins decisively — and for many buyers, this category alone tips the entire decision. The slim-chassis difference between these two pianos isn't a small spec-sheet nuance; it's a fundamentally different physical product.
The PX-S1100 is exceptionally slim for an 88-key hammer-action piano. At 9.1 inches deep, 4.0 inches tall and 24.7 lb, it is 2.5 inches shallower, 2.5 inches lower and 1.3 lb lighter than the P-125. Its touch-sensor control panel supports the streamlined design, and six AA batteries allow roughly four hours of untethered use. That combination remains a meaningful advantage for apartments, lessons, travel, and modern home setups.
The P-125 uses a more traditional slab design: 11.6 inches deep, 6.5 inches tall, 26.0 lb. It's still portable — the weight gap is only 1.3 lb — but it occupies meaningfully more shelf space, sits taller on a stand, and looks more conventional. Yamaha uses physical buttons along the top of the chassis, which some players prefer for direct access vs the PX-S1100's touch surface. There's no battery option on the P-125; you need an AC outlet at all times.
Winner
PX-S1100, decisively. The slim chassis is the most consequential design difference in this entire comparison. For any buyer who cares about physical footprint, portability, or modern aesthetics, this category alone justifies the PX-S1100.
Casio PX-S1100
Yamaha P-125


Wireless is where the PX-S1100 pulls clearly ahead of the P-125, while the app ecosystem is the more nuanced trade-off.
The PX-S1100 supports Bluetooth audio and MIDI through the included WU-BT10 adapter. You can play music from your phone through its speakers and use apps wirelessly; the adapter is included, but the Bluetooth hardware isn't built into the piano itself. Casio Music Space handles voice selection, recording and lesson features. When the adapter isn't fitted, the USB-A port takes a USB drive for recording and playing back MIDI songs and WAV audio.
The P-125 has no Bluetooth in Yamaha's specifications. Where it wins is the app ecosystem: Smart Pianist is generally regarded as the more polished app, with sheet music display, voice selection and a cleaner interface than Music Space, and it works over a USB cable out of the box. Both pianos have a two-track song recorder for self-review during practice.
Winner
PX-S1100 for wireless flexibility; P-125 for app polish. The Casio includes the WU-BT10 Bluetooth audio/MIDI adapter and has built-in recording support. Yamaha's Smart Pianist remains the stronger app, but the P-125 has no Bluetooth.
This is no longer an equal-price new-product comparison. The PX-S1100 had Amazon US offers when we checked, and Casio still sells it. The original P-125 had no Amazon US offers, and Yamaha USA's P-series line-up now lists the P-125a and the newer P-225 instead. For a used P-125, compare seller, condition, included accessories and return terms rather than relying on an old price.
Do not value either model from an old MSRP or unsupported resale percentage. Used-market value depends on age, condition, included pedal, power supply and Bluetooth adapter, seller reputation, and return protection. Casio lists the WU-BT10 adapter, SP-3 pedal, music stand and AC adaptor as included accessories.
Winner
PX-S1100. It's the current model, with portability and connectivity the P-125 can't match; a used P-125 only makes sense when its condition and price are clearly right.
If you're comparing the PX-S1100 with a current Yamaha rather than the P-125, these are the two to look at.
Yamaha P-145BT. Yamaha's entry portable uses the GHC (Graded Hammer Compact) keyboard, 64-note polyphony, 10 voices and 7 W × 2 amplifiers, and adds Bluetooth audio. At 10.6 inches deep and 24 lb 8 oz it weighs about the same as the PX-S1100 but is deeper, and Yamaha lists no battery option. It's the lower-cost choice; the PX-S1100 has three times the polyphony and Bluetooth MIDI as well as audio.
Yamaha P-225. Yamaha's newer model at the P-125's level keeps 192-note polyphony and 24 voices, moves to the GHC keyboard and adds Bluetooth audio. Yamaha lists 7 W × 2 amplifiers, two standard headphone jacks, AUX OUT jacks and a two-track recorder, in a body 10.7 inches deep that weighs 25 lb 6 oz. Against the PX-S1100 it's the closer match on polyphony and voices; the Casio stays slimmer, runs on batteries and adds Bluetooth MIDI.
For the whole Yamaha P-series side by side, see our Yamaha P-45 vs P-71, P-125 and P-225 comparison, and for Yamaha's entry model in depth, our Yamaha P-45 review.
Casio PX-S1000 (the predecessor). Casio's US site still has a PX-S1000 page, and its specs show how little changed: the same Smart Scaled Hammer Action keyboard, AiR sound source, 192-note polyphony, 18 tones, 8 W + 8 W speakers, six-AA battery option, dimensions and weight. The difference is the connections. The PX-S1000 has Bluetooth audio built in and a USB Type B port; the PX-S1100 adds a USB-A port for recording audio to a drive and uses the included WU-BT10 adapter, which carries Bluetooth MIDI as well as audio. A PX-S1000 in good condition is essentially the same piano to play.
Casio PX-S3100 (the step up). Casio lists the same keyboard, sound source, polyphony and speakers in the same slim body, plus 700 tones, 200 rhythms with automatic accompaniment, and a three-track, five-song MIDI recorder alongside the audio recorder. Buy it if you want a piano that doubles as an arranger keyboard; for piano practice alone, the PX-S1100 has what you need. Our review of the Casio PX-S7000 and the PX-S line compares it with the Smart Hybrid models above it.
Roland FP-10 (the main rival at a lower price). Roland lists the PHA-4 Standard keyboard with escapement and ivory feel, 96-note polyphony, 6 W × 2 speakers and Bluetooth MIDI. It's heavier, at 27 lb 13 oz without the music rest, and its action adds escapement, which Casio's spec page doesn't list for the PX-S1100. Our Roland FP-10 review covers it in depth.
Yes, for the right player. Strip away the spec comparisons and the question becomes practical: which buyer profile fits your situation? Here's the decision in plain language, including who should skip it.
The Casio PX-S1100 is the stronger pick for portability and connectivity, and it's the current model. Casio still sells it with the WU-BT10 Bluetooth adapter included, and it runs on batteries. The original P-125 now makes sense only as a well-kept used unit for buyers who value GHS action, Smart Pianist and Yamaha familiarity; otherwise compare the newer P-145BT and P-225.
For full official specs, see Casio's PX-S1100 product page and Yamaha's P-125 product page, P-145BT specs and P-225 specs, Casio's PX-S1000 and PX-S3100 pages, and Roland's FP-10 specifications. To see both pianos against the rest of their respective brand lineups, our best Casio keyboard pianos guide and Best Yamaha Digital Pianos guide cover the full ranked lists.

Our pick · Slim chassis, included Bluetooth adapter, battery operation, and modern controls.
Check price on Amazon for the Casio PX-S1100 (opens in a new tab)
Older model · No Amazon US offers. If you want a Yamaha, compare the P-145BT and P-225 above.
Watch out
The original Yamaha P-125 no longer has Amazon US offers, so this review no longer links to it. The Casio link is the black PX-S1100, which Casio sells with the WU-BT10 Bluetooth adapter. For a current Yamaha, see the P-145BT and P-225 section above.
Yes, for players who want a slim, portable 88-key piano. Casio lists Smart Scaled Hammer Action keys, the AiR sound source, 192-note polyphony, 8 W + 8 W speakers, battery power from six AA cells and an included Bluetooth audio and MIDI adapter. Skip it if you prefer a heavier, Yamaha-style action or never move your piano.
Very. Casio lists it at 9.1 inches deep, 4.0 inches tall and 24.7 lb, which is 2.5 inches shallower and lower than Yamaha's P-125 (11.6 by 6.5 inches, 26.0 lb). It also runs on six AA batteries. If you're shopping for an apartment or a setup you'll fold away, that slim body is its biggest advantage.
Yes, through the WU-BT10 adapter that Casio includes in the box. It adds Bluetooth audio, so you can stream music through the piano's speakers, and Bluetooth MIDI for apps such as Casio Music Space. The adapter plugs into the piano rather than being built in. Yamaha lists no Bluetooth for the P-125, which connects to apps over USB.
Yes, two ways. It has a two-track, one-song MIDI recorder and sends MIDI over USB. With a USB drive in its USB-A port, Casio says it also records and plays back WAV audio, up to 99 songs of about 25 minutes each, so you can record real audio without a computer. The P-125's recorder is MIDI only.
Casio lists the same Smart Scaled Hammer Action keyboard, AiR sound source, 192-note polyphony and speakers in the same slim body. The PX-S3100 adds 700 tones, 200 rhythms with automatic accompaniment and a three-track, five-song MIDI recorder. Pick the PX-S1100 if you want a piano, and the PX-S3100 if you also want an arranger keyboard.
Yes, if the beginner is happy with a lighter action. It has 88 weighted, touch-sensitive keys with five sensitivity levels, 192-note polyphony, two headphone jacks and Casio's SP-3 pedal in the box. Some teachers prefer the heavier feel of Yamaha's actions; if yours does, compare the P-145BT, Yamaha's current entry portable.